Why Is That Important?: Looking at Jackson Pollock

0 Posted by - February 8, 2013 - Uncategorized


  • reethkitchards May 4, 2012 - 8:01 pm Reply

    Obla di obla da, life goes on bra. People are so square. So not hip. Worse
    when they talk. I giggle. So does Jackson. 

  • 14jwh May 4, 2012 - 10:54 pm Reply

    do it your self or do not ….life is showing up and doing. if u have not u
    cannot say anything negative…if anyone can do it then do it….right
    …or don’t do it right? either u want to do it or not…don’t **** those
    who do or that it is appreciated.

  • MULESLAX May 7, 2012 - 8:30 am Reply

    Ah, so Pollock’s paintings are validated because he liked psychoanalysis.
    Good on you, art historians.

  • Mosaic Classics May 10, 2012 - 3:18 am Reply

    Search Ted Nash and Pollock to hear what Jackson Pollock sounds like in

  • Timothy Thoreson May 10, 2012 - 8:46 am Reply

    i was really stressed and ounce so i made red and black fist prints on
    canvas also adding salt lemon juice and pieces of broken glass and i did
    feel a little better when it was finished

  • cin con May 13, 2012 - 3:16 pm Reply

    my picture is not art, its censored ******.

  • Barbara G. Santiago May 14, 2012 - 11:01 pm Reply

    Abstraction art is meant to convey emotion, not to necessarily be over

  • שן זהב May 15, 2012 - 7:38 am Reply

    OMG such bullshit!

  • Jessica Newsom May 16, 2012 - 10:38 pm Reply

    Maybe I just really like art and Pollock, but I found this so interesting.
    The hands! Oh goodness.

  • Jennifer S. Li May 17, 2012 - 9:37 pm Reply

    Wonderful conversation elucidating Pollock’s painting within the trajectory
    of art history.

  • dejffjed May 19, 2012 - 8:16 pm Reply

    Exactly. And most of the artists of modern era have been painting for
    themselves. That’s why I can’t understand those who say it is crap as well
    as those who relish collecting the paintings for immense amount of money
    and boasting in front of others how rich and sensitive they are even though
    they have no real sensual connection with the painting.

  • ductile12 May 22, 2012 - 8:17 pm Reply

    the emperor has no clothes..if it looks like —and smells like — its poo

  • pate357 May 24, 2012 - 12:11 pm Reply

    The emperor has no clothes.

  • Mark Sehl May 27, 2012 - 1:25 pm Reply

    Nice video. I like splattering, cutting loose with paint. But it was not
    just random as the discussion reveals.

  • josh chapple May 29, 2012 - 12:02 pm Reply

    John squire

  • MrBepruitt May 29, 2012 - 6:10 pm Reply

    I think that his paintings are very over interpretated! Pollock was
    actually a good artist with “regular” paintings,but this is just
    abstract..nothing more…and everyone has an opinion and thier own
    iterpretation which is what abstract art is.It’s like a song with words
    that mean one thing to someone and another to someone else..

  • Leave a reply