do it your self or do not ….life is showing up and doing. if u have not u
cannot say anything negative…if anyone can do it then do it….right
…or don’t do it right? either u want to do it or not…don’t **** those
who do or that it is appreciated.
i was really stressed and ounce so i made red and black fist prints on
canvas also adding salt lemon juice and pieces of broken glass and i did
feel a little better when it was finished
Exactly. And most of the artists of modern era have been painting for
themselves. That’s why I can’t understand those who say it is crap as well
as those who relish collecting the paintings for immense amount of money
and boasting in front of others how rich and sensitive they are even though
they have no real sensual connection with the painting.
I think that his paintings are very over interpretated! Pollock was
actually a good artist with “regular” paintings,but this is just
abstract..nothing more…and everyone has an opinion and thier own
iterpretation which is what abstract art is.It’s like a song with words
that mean one thing to someone and another to someone else..
16 Comments
Obla di obla da, life goes on bra. People are so square. So not hip. Worse
when they talk. I giggle. So does Jackson.
do it your self or do not ….life is showing up and doing. if u have not u
cannot say anything negative…if anyone can do it then do it….right
…or don’t do it right? either u want to do it or not…don’t **** those
who do or that it is appreciated.
Ah, so Pollock’s paintings are validated because he liked psychoanalysis.
Good on you, art historians.
Search Ted Nash and Pollock to hear what Jackson Pollock sounds like in
jazz.
i was really stressed and ounce so i made red and black fist prints on
canvas also adding salt lemon juice and pieces of broken glass and i did
feel a little better when it was finished
my picture is not art, its censored ******.
Abstraction art is meant to convey emotion, not to necessarily be over
analyzed.
OMG such bullshit!
Maybe I just really like art and Pollock, but I found this so interesting.
The hands! Oh goodness.
Wonderful conversation elucidating Pollock’s painting within the trajectory
of art history.
Exactly. And most of the artists of modern era have been painting for
themselves. That’s why I can’t understand those who say it is crap as well
as those who relish collecting the paintings for immense amount of money
and boasting in front of others how rich and sensitive they are even though
they have no real sensual connection with the painting.
the emperor has no clothes..if it looks like —and smells like — its poo
!!!
The emperor has no clothes.
Nice video. I like splattering, cutting loose with paint. But it was not
just random as the discussion reveals.
John squire
I think that his paintings are very over interpretated! Pollock was
actually a good artist with “regular” paintings,but this is just
abstract..nothing more…and everyone has an opinion and thier own
iterpretation which is what abstract art is.It’s like a song with words
that mean one thing to someone and another to someone else..