SAW THIS SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THOUGHT THEN AS I DO NOW THEY **** THAT THIS
TRUCK DRIVER FOUND AN UNKNOWN POLLOCK BEFORE THEY DID. THATS WHY THE DENY
HER.
Mamá te amo, pero dios qué daría por tener una vieja con esta suerte, o al
menos que mi madre fuera a una feria de las pulgas mañana y encontrara
aunque sea un Samy Benmayor todo asqueroso para vender por cien lucas.
It’s easy to see that the painting continues around the stretchers on the
edges without an interruption in the pattern of the paint – which would be
just about impossible in the ‘action’ style of painting. So, it’s pretty
clear it has been cut down, which could acount for Hoving’s impression of
it as ‘compacted’. And Ben Heller’s pointing to the edge. But why don’t
these experts think of that?
I appreciate, I think, where the painting’s owner is coming from. But I
don’t understand turning down the $2 million. Sure, someone else may make
more money, but so what? Two million is better than nothing. If you are
creative, live frugally, keep the thermostat turned down, you could make
that money go quite a way. 🙂
Not everyone in the art world, and not everyone with money, is as much of a
quadraped cousin of a horse as Hoving reveals himself to be in this video.
Granted, this lady is from a different social class than he is, but that is
not supposed to matter a) in America, or b) whether the painting is a
Pollock or not. At least she is genuine.
Many artists destroy or discard their ‘failed’ works. Anyone who has spent
time around artists, including fellow artists, know that artists often are
the worst judges of their own work, especially if they are under stress,
drinking, and/or depressed – as Pollack was infamous for. Some artist wind
up collecting quite a bit of art by their struggling fellows, but a lot of
that often ends up tossed when the rent money runs out…
The potential buyer sounds like Paul Giamatti, proper dead on ****. these
art snob cunts just **** any outsider making real money from their own
shit, full of cunts, of course some painting may end up somewhere
unexpected.
She definitely should have taken the money. Even if someday it’s proven to
be a Pollock, she’ll either be dead or too old to enjoy the money it sells
for. What a waste!
23 Comments
Why soo many Artists get their art sold for big sum of money AFTER they Die
?? Even in Music
BECAUSE THEY WILL TURN AROUND AND SELL IT FOR OVER A HUNDRED MILLION. IN
MAY POLLOCK #9, 1948 SOLD FOR 140 MILLION.
DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY INFO ON THE CURRENT DISPOSITION OF THIS CASE?
SAW THIS SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THOUGHT THEN AS I DO NOW THEY **** THAT THIS
TRUCK DRIVER FOUND AN UNKNOWN POLLOCK BEFORE THEY DID. THATS WHY THE DENY
HER.
Mamá te amo, pero dios qué daría por tener una vieja con esta suerte, o al
menos que mi madre fuera a una feria de las pulgas mañana y encontrara
aunque sea un Samy Benmayor todo asqueroso para vender por cien lucas.
Mert az is 🙂 He was born in Hungary 44:25
It’s easy to see that the painting continues around the stretchers on the
edges without an interruption in the pattern of the paint – which would be
just about impossible in the ‘action’ style of painting. So, it’s pretty
clear it has been cut down, which could acount for Hoving’s impression of
it as ‘compacted’. And Ben Heller’s pointing to the edge. But why don’t
these experts think of that?
I appreciate, I think, where the painting’s owner is coming from. But I
don’t understand turning down the $2 million. Sure, someone else may make
more money, but so what? Two million is better than nothing. If you are
creative, live frugally, keep the thermostat turned down, you could make
that money go quite a way. 🙂
Not everyone in the art world, and not everyone with money, is as much of a
quadraped cousin of a horse as Hoving reveals himself to be in this video.
Granted, this lady is from a different social class than he is, but that is
not supposed to matter a) in America, or b) whether the painting is a
Pollock or not. At least she is genuine.
Many artists destroy or discard their ‘failed’ works. Anyone who has spent
time around artists, including fellow artists, know that artists often are
the worst judges of their own work, especially if they are under stress,
drinking, and/or depressed – as Pollack was infamous for. Some artist wind
up collecting quite a bit of art by their struggling fellows, but a lot of
that often ends up tossed when the rent money runs out…
Art is real , people are frauds……
1:10:22 – John Myatt “Would you like to have a look at the painting in
question?” “Yes. :)” “Could you of drew this?” “…no… :l ” forever
alone.
Art is such fraud.
that song is so damn good.
We all know Hoving is a douchebag
Paul Biro sounds hungarian 0:20:30
The potential buyer sounds like Paul Giamatti, proper dead on ****. these
art snob cunts just **** any outsider making real money from their own
shit, full of cunts, of course some painting may end up somewhere
unexpected.
She definitely should have taken the money. Even if someday it’s proven to
be a Pollock, she’ll either be dead or too old to enjoy the money it sells
for. What a waste!
wow way to go spoil the ending
Maybe it was sold by Pollock in the beginning of his career before anyone
knew him- before he really knew himself. Lol.
No…..He’s just another intellectual, art snob……..Salut!!!!!
I love Jackson Pollock. I want a painting for $5.
9 mil and she turned it down!!!!!!!!