Damien Hirst – The First Look presented by Channel 4

0 Posted by - July 24, 2013 - Uncategorized


  • CrypticHelium December 7, 2012 - 10:46 am Reply

    Guys he buys the bodies of animals that are ALREADY dead. He doesn’t kill
    them. What the **** gave you guys that idea?

  • Paul Ooo December 9, 2012 - 8:05 pm Reply

    But are the sharks/butterflies/flies quite flattered? And would you be so
    flattered if you were specifally killed to be made into art?

  • plantluver9 December 11, 2012 - 12:59 pm Reply

    I think you might have to face the possibility that Noel is a prat too

  • Wenceslao Futanaki December 14, 2012 - 11:25 pm Reply

    is good to see that someone gets it, this is merely a sadistic game by the

  • john spencer December 17, 2012 - 12:14 am Reply

    What a quandary British “art” got itself into; In that there was allegedly
    none before, then all of a sudden because Sarah Kent said it was so – it
    was so. Damien hirst is a nice person (and actually a very funny guy) but
    even he would agree (before every knob bigged him up) that he was the
    luckiest Yorkshire-lad half-wit on the planet

  • véronique perle December 17, 2012 - 3:32 am Reply

    Is THIS art ???? I would like to see the artist in the tank unstead and
    leave the shark alife: to me it is worth more !

  • Ana Hol December 19, 2012 - 3:40 pm Reply

    That is really quite a brilliant way to put it.

  • Ana Hol December 23, 2012 - 1:33 am Reply

    A drunk ******* on the street is art. Everything is art if you look at it
    with an artistic view point. I believe this is the point of his work. Many
    people view art in a very small category with all sorts of restrictions but
    art has no barriers. A butterfly is an insect but wouldn’t you also
    consider it art? I can understand people being upset with his work because
    of the fact that much of it used to be living, but if I died and then was
    later used as art I would be quite flattered.

  • Tom J. Byrne December 23, 2012 - 10:23 am Reply

    Damian Hirst, adding the ‘F’ to art.

  • abosier December 24, 2012 - 4:11 pm Reply

    Because normal people are there to buy food to eat not look at the chicken
    wings and speculate what they are to feel or the deeper meaning in why they
    are packaged in one direction. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. I see
    what Hirst is doing and understand why Noel is into it. Noel is the kind of
    person to go to the supermarket and not give a **** about it cause he’s in
    the cookie aisle listening to the rolling stones and loading up the cart
    with sweets and having one on the way to checkout.

  • LotusTheobroma December 27, 2012 - 6:38 pm Reply

    If you meet someone new, and decide you’re attracted to them, then they
    suddenly have value. If you’re not, then you move on. You don’t suddenly
    hate them for daring to be a potential mate, just cuz YOU couldn’t love
    them. BUT if you find out they’re getting married, you think, “Oh, good for
    them.” You’re not angry that someone cares about them when you don’t. This
    art is the same. Just cuz it’s not your type doesn’t mean it isn’t
    important to other people. Please respect that.

  • LotusTheobroma December 30, 2012 - 1:30 am Reply

    Then pray tell: what is art? Let’s talk about that. Art that evokes no
    emotion isn’t real art. Art that has nothing of it’s creator in it isn’t
    real art. But that’s it. If it took a real bit of your effort and soul and
    feeling, then it’s art, isn’t it? I think you’re not seeing how much art
    actually exists in the world. And, he’s destroyed the lives of flies.
    That’s all. He buys already dead things for his work. He harms no one. How
    offended you are is more shocking than anything he’s made.

  • LotusTheobroma December 31, 2012 - 4:24 pm Reply

    Not at first, which is the point: at the start, as they said, people would
    walk into a gallery and go “Wtf, this isn’t art.” And people are still
    doing that, now. But you ARE impressed by their existence when you visit a
    museum. His work is considered valuable now, as he said, simply because
    people put prices on it. The work itself isn’t work anything unless the
    beholder finds value in it. The beholders find his work valuable, so it is.
    If you don’t, then it’s not your concern.

  • ElymnionElohim January 1, 2013 - 6:26 pm Reply

    What a load of ****… Seriously… -_-

  • Ame Olvera January 2, 2013 - 1:09 am Reply

    Contemporary art lessons

  • LexxiGB1 January 6, 2013 - 7:35 pm Reply

    What year was this?

  • hazbutler January 9, 2013 - 9:28 pm Reply

    putting on the ritz

  • hazbutler January 15, 2013 - 9:36 am Reply

    according to you, and who are you to say what art is?

  • Vince Leuenberger January 17, 2013 - 9:11 am Reply

    damien hirst retrospect

  • Caitlin Hoole January 19, 2013 - 3:11 pm Reply

    Damien Hurst exhibition (Tate London) ft. Noel Fielding

  • z. January 21, 2013 - 10:29 am Reply

    I came here looking for Noel Fielding; I leave looking for cheap flights to
    London. I *need* to see this exhibition like I need air.

  • pretenditsagoodworld January 23, 2013 - 4:05 am Reply

    simply amazing

  • Leave a reply